Science topics: Academic Journals
Science topic

Academic Journals - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Academic Journals, and find Academic Journals experts.
Questions related to Academic Journals
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
I am looking for resources that providing updated management tools and also innovation for business administration. Apart from academic journals, are there any interest sources to recommend?
Relevant answer
Answer
Go through some Executive Education platforms such as INSEAD
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
6 answers
Can a preprint, that is yet to be peer-reviewed, be cited for in a research paper? If yes, then are there any formal requirements that need to be fulfilled before the submission of a research article?
Relevant answer
Answer
Some journals accept preprints as valid references while some journals categorically state that preprints cannot be included as references. But you can cite them and there are recommended ways of citing it as mentioned by Wolfgang R. Dick. Preprints are still valuable resources although they are not peer-reviewed so as the grey literature. Grey literature is also not peer-reviewed but since there are no other published resources then they are acceptable. Similarly if there is no research available in any particular area then preprints can be cited and referenced. In the end, its all about how you present your argument !
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
4 answers
I am looking for journals that will publish newly developed tool/server/web application/pipeline that are useful in biology, or a newly curated database with biological significance.
Can anyone kindly suggest some journals that publishes Bioinformatics and Computational Biology papers that will publish -
  • Bioinformatics Tools/Servers (Machine Learning, Deep Learning based or else)
  • Text Mining
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Pipeline etc.
I know a few such as:
  1. Bioinformatics
  2. Nucleic Acids Research
  3. Database
  4. GigaScience
  5. Nature Scientific Data
  6. Nature Computational Science
  7. Briefings in Bioinformatics
  8. BMC Bioinformatics
  9. PLOS Computational Biology
  10. Journal of Cheminformatics
If you know more, kindly suggest the journal names. Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
I think my suggestion still holds. If your tool is usefull for let's say people working on viruses journals that are focussed on this topic might be interested.
Perhaps a good way might be to 'just' search for "bioinformatics tool" in Google Scholar to see which type of journals 'pop up' (besides the ones you already know).
Again good luck.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
8 answers
Dear all,
I'm looking for information about the relative distribution of different article types preferably in education / social science journals but basically anything goes. More precisely, I'm interested in what percentage of published papers are reviews, empirical articles, thoretical articles etc. All tips are highly appreciated.
With kind regards,
Dr. Pekka Mertala
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Pekka, this is an interesting and rather unusual technical question. Like Dean Whitehead I don't know of any resource / database that provides this information. It certainly depends to some extent on the different disciplines of research. In our discipline, chemistry, most leading journals have three categories of articles: Communications, full papers, and review articles. Personally I don't see the benefits of knowing the distribution of these article types over the journals in a certain discipline (or even all areas of research). The reason is that, at least in chemistry, there are also renowned journals that publish only review articles or only communications. A good example for the first category is Chemical Reviews which has an impact factor of 60.622 (in 2020). On the other hand, the RSC (= Royal Society of Chemistry in the UK) journal Chemical Communications publishes mostly communications (+ occasional "Feature Articles" and "Highlights"). Thus in chemical journals there is no uniform presence of the different article types.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
13 answers
I have submitted my work to an academic journal 4 days ago. At first, the status was " manuscripted submitted", then it changed to "with journal administration" and finally today the status is " assigned to editor". Does this mean that my paper has passed the initial screening of the admin? Or no one has viewed it yet?
Relevant answer
Answer
Agre with Dr. Hermann Gruenwald
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
29 answers
From where can I obtain the list of journals provided with impact factor by thomson reuters as a donloadable file or simply online view. I tried it from thomson reuter website. However the website asks for some specific institutional login. Any help?
Relevant answer
Estoy interesada también en la lista de revistas de alto impacto.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
Hi,
  • The journal that I am submitting my research paper to, indicated that Color art is free of charge only for online publication.
  • I illustrated a heat map in my research which is in red and green colors.
  • Do I have to make that greyscale as I do not want to pay additional money?
  • If yes, how can I make a heat map with three colors (red, green, and black for zero) in just two colors (Black and white)?
  • Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Alireza Tehranian many thanks for asking this important technical question which will certainly be of significant interest to many other RG members. My personal suggestion would be to just go ahead with your submission and just accept the statement that "Color art is free of charge only for online publication". Nowadays published articles are read mostly online, so in my opinion it should be perfectly sufficient if your heat map is in full color only in the online version. Normally during the online submission process you will be asked if you are willing to pay for color art in the printed version. In that case just click on NO. Then the publisher will convert your color figure into black and whit during the printing process. To be absolutely certain about this, I suggest that you carefully read the Instructions for Authors of the journal.
Good luck with your work and best wishes!
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
3 answers
In the 1980s Bealer wrote Quality and Concept which presented a type-free first-order approach
to intensional logic to compete with other higher-order, type-theoretic and modal approaches.
The presentation (both in the book and in a published article) is very sketchy (some non-trivial lemmas are merely stated) and the presentation is not easy to follow.
I was so impressed and intrigued by Bealer's philosophical arguments based on his system that I took it upon myself to clarify the presentation of his intensional logic and to furnish detailed proofs of the soundness and completeness results, which I hope might interest a larger audience. I wrote a paper containing this material which gives a general philosophical motivation and points out some open problems. I was interested in being sure of the correctness of these results before advancing to purely philosophical discussions on the advantage of this approach.
What would be a good journal to submit this paper to ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Look at the journals listed in the bibliography of the entry for "Intensional Logic" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
Some more recent work by Bealer is also referenced.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
9 answers
Is it Possible that a Research paper submitted to Peer Review can be Accepted without Revisions? How frequent?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, it is possible but very rare. Definitely, there will be some revisions suggested by the reviewer, it may be minor revisions or it may be major revisions. One has to welcome the reviewers' suggestions, it is an opportunity to learn from the expert people of that particular subject domains.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
16 answers
A few weeks ago, I received an invitation to be a peer reviewer of a Spanish journal in category Q1. This is owned by a commercial academic publisher and charges the authors 835€ for publishing, adducing that this is the cost of translation and layout of the article. My response to the invitation was my rate fee proposal for this type of assignment.
This experience motivated the writing of this article, a reflection on receiving payment for peer review work in journals that charge authors with APC costs or charge readers for downloading.
The discussion is served.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
18 answers
Colleagues,
do you know some UAV-dedicated Special Issues that are open for submission now? Both Magazines and Journals SIs will be highly appreciated! No discrimination on the publishers (IEEE, Frontiers, MDPI, Elsevier, River....)!
Thank you :)
PS: I think following this discussion will be useful. both to find Special Issues and/or to advertise them
Relevant answer
Answer
Me and my colleagues Edmond Nurellari, Lei Shu, Lingjun Meng, Sami Aldalahmeh are launching the research topic Towards Next Generation UAV- Enabled Applications: Communication, Sensing and Security in Frontiers:
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
15 answers
I wonder if submitting in a special issue is better than submitting in a regular issue.
Relevant answer
Answer
In a special issue, materials are either united by a single idea, or timed to coincide with an important date, etc. On this basis, the readership will be special, perhaps more expert.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
I have noticed that some journals in which I have acted as a reviewer do not send the revised paper back to me before accepting (i.e., the editor decides to accept). I find this a bit problematic since sometimes I have requested some major changes that I would have liked to see before final accepting. Is this common and do you think it is a good practice?
Relevant answer
Answer
Well, since its the editor who stands between the author (s) and reviewers, he is expected to use his discretion to judge
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
13 answers
Hello friends, my article has been published in AIJRPreprint online and it is also available on Google Scholar. Would it be count as a publication in my CV?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Why you let others know about your insights and methodologies before publication? It is a security issue; the original content of your manuscript may be copied and published by others before you can do that. My advice is not to upload any research anywhere until it has been published with your name.
The term “plagiarism” has different meanings, but it usually includes copying somebody else’s work without permission. It occurs when a writer uses, intentional or unintentional, someone else’s language, ideas, or material without acknowledging its source.
Since there is a chance the someone may plagiarism your papers after you have uploaded any preprint on any portal, please take the following advice from me:
  • For the coming future, do not upload any paper anywhere until it is published with your name. Even if it is a "preprint"!
  • If you had done something like that as a "preprint", for instance, I advise you to delete the preprint and wait for two months before sending the paper to any journal.
This is because:
  • There is a high chance that someone may claim your valuable thoughts as theirs.
  • There is also a chance the someone may plagiarise your paper.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
12 answers
I publish papers in International Journals of Academic Research World (IJARW) which are :
International journal of Engineering and Information Systems (IJEAIS) ,
International Journal of Academic Management Science Research (IJAMSR) ,
International Journal of Academic Information Systems Research (IJAISR) ,
International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER) ,
International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research (IJAPR) ,
International Journal of Academic and Applied Research (IJAAR) ,
International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR) , and
International Journal of Academic Health and Medical Research (IJAHMR) .
and their ISSNs are
2000:000X, 2000:001X, 2000:002X, 2000:003X, 2000:004X, 2000:005X, 2000:006X, and 2000:007X respectively.
the problem is when I check the validity of the ISSN in websites like https://portal.issn.org/ , I found that its not valid ISSN .
What does that mean ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Fuyu Zhou ,
The journal “International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research” ISSN 2643-9123 is using a fake impact factor. A common practice of a predatory journal. So, indeed definitely not indexed in Clarivate’s SCIE or SSCI.
The publisher behind this journal "International Journals of Academic Research World" and by definition all journals published by this publisher are most likely predatory. See my previous reply on December 17th, 2020.
So, better avoid.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
3 answers
How can i download supplementary information of Elsiever/science direct journals?
Relevant answer
Answer
To get ESI/supplementary information of Elsevier journals, you can get instruction to authors who wish paper publication .If you open an issue of the journal first or last page of the journal.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
3 answers
I want to know more about the publication process and speed. Thank You!
Relevant answer
Answer
Milad,
The "Journal of Iranian Studies" and "Iranian Studies" are not ehe same journals. "Iranian Studies," which is published by Routledge (a well-respected publisher) has been published on behalf of the Association for Iranian Studies since 1967. The Journal of Iranian Studies has only been published since 2017. It is "open-access" and does not share the same scholarly reputation as "Iranian Studies." I hope this helps.
Don
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
4 answers
I would like to use some of the figures in a book chapter that is going to be published in Springer. As these journals (source of figures) are open access, I would like to just confirm that is it sufficient for me to simply cite publications and no further permission required from journals. Also, is there any restriction in the use of numbers of figures from different articles? Kindly share any other important information regarding the matter.
When I click into reprints and permission, I got the instruction which is attached herewith.
So, I would like to confirm do I need further permission for using some figures from these articles in my book chapter.
With regards
Chitra
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Elangbam Chitra Devi, you may be interested in this page on the Creative Commons page, explaining how to properly attribute a CC resource.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
16 answers
Recently, one of my papers has been published after five year of its final acceptance by a SCI index journal, that to after lot of reminders. Can anybody suggest about fixing the upper time-limit for the publication of manuscripts at least in peer reviewed Journals?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have had the same experience. I received the acceptance letter in 2018. It will publish in the next issue of the journal (2021).
DOI: 10.1615/JPorMedia.2021025407
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
14 answers
Dear Experts,
Considering the good quality research publication, I need your suggestions on journal selection. What should be considered while selecting a journal for publication of a good quality paper, either journal category (like Q1, Q2, etc) or impact factor (Like 4,5,6) particularly in the Marketing Research?
I observed some journals having Q1 with low IF and some journals having Q2 with high IF like 3 or 4. Your feedback will be highly appreciated. Thank you
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
1 answer
Foudation, evolution , institucional positioning and success of the Portuguese book club, Círculo de Leitores, along the three first decades of activity (1971-2001).
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
4 answers
What are some good and free scopus indexed journals in the field of human computer interaction?
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
34 answers
Some journals give reviewers 60 days, others give 40 days, 30 days, or 20 days to review a paper. MDPI journals give only 10 days, but it can be extended if the reviewer needs more time. In my opinion, 10 days might be too short, but 60 days is excessive. Allowing 60 days for a peer review is adding to the response time unnecessarily, and disadvantaging the authors. I can thoroughly review a paper in a day (if I dedicate myself to it), or two at most. A reviewer should only accept a review request if they are not too busy to do it in the next 10 to 20 days. I have encountered situations in which a reviewer agrees to the review, but does not submit the review at the end of 60 days, wasting those valuable 60 days from the author. What do you think the allowed time for reviewers should be?
Relevant answer
Answer
Depends on J. to J. In general four weaks to six months . The time is specified in Instruction of authors .
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
Hello,
I have three queries mentioned below:
  1. I have submitted my manuscript around two months ago at "COMPUTERS AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL". The average number of weeks to the initial decision is 4-7 weeks (as written on a Journal webpage) and it's been around 11 weeks and still, I have not got any updates from them. Please let me know what can I do next?
  2. Also, is it possible to submit the same manuscript to more than one journal at once to save time? If any of the journals will reply me, I will withdraw the manuscript from other journals.
  3. Please let me know some free Scopus Indexed Journals related to Computer Engineering/Computer Security which will take little time to make decisions because I am in a hurry. It is my first time publishing a paper and I want it to be published anyhow at the earliest (because I need to go abroad and the deadline for scholarships is approaching).
Thank You
Relevant answer
Answer
You may also have a look into this discussion: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Unreasonable_review_times
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
I am trying to publish a paper for the first time and I do not know which journals would be good for my paper (having good reputation and short publishing time).
It would be great if anyone could suggest journals.
My paper is related to Application Security and Scrum Framework.
Relevant answer
Answer
What research do you want to publish?
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
Science-IF=41.8
Science Advances-IF=13.1
Nature-IF=42.7
Nature materials-IF= 38.663
Advanced materials- IF=27.3
Nature Communications-IF= 12.121
Nanophotonics-IF=8.449
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation –IF=4.3
IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters-IF=3.7
IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine-IF=3.7
IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques-IF=3.4
Physical Review Letters-IF=8.3
Physical Review E-IF=2.2
Scientific Reports-IF=3.99 (required to pay charge)
Journal of Physics D Applied Physics-IF=3.17
AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications-IF=2.9
Optics Communications-IF=2.3
Optics & Laser Technology-IF=3.86
Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications-IF=1.3
IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation-IF=1.9
Applied Physics A-IF=1.78
IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility-IF=2.01
optik - international journal for light and electron optics-IF=2.18
applied optics-IF=1.96
Electronics Letters-IF=1.3
International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering -IF=1.5
Progress in Electromagnetics Research (PIER)-IF=1.89 (required to pay charge)
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies-IF=0.9
Waves in Random and Complex Media-IF=4.85
Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine-IF=1.82
Bioelectromagnetics-IF=2.01
International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics-IF=0.7
Radioengineering-IF=1.07
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics-IF=0.5
Microwave and optical technology letters-IF=0.9
International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices And Fields-IF=0.83
Electromagnetics-IF=0.5
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank for the list
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
4 answers
1. Read articles in prestigious journals
Relevant answer
Answer
The rules of professional text editing and the rules of editorial preparation of the text should be applied in accordance with the requirements of the specific scientific journal to which the written manuscript is addressed.
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
4 answers
There is a certain journal in my field, for which the first feedback is at least 8 months after submission. This is based on a number of anecdotal evidence, not just one. Even then, the feedback is scant and based only on a single very short and inaccurate review report. This journal is known as a respectable journal in the field, with a high impact factor as well. It is just not unfair, considering that the reviewer and the associate editor only took at most an hour to write their reviews (this is clear when you read the reports) despite the 8 month long review period, but also unprofessional and bad for the journal. If they keep doing this, they will deter people from submitting their work there, ultimately lowering the quality. What are your experiences with long review times?
Relevant answer
Answer
The long review times can be very frustrating. What one can do is to monitor your submission, if by 6 weeks there is no indication of a reviewer, one can withdraw and send to another journal. But it is always good to check the review process of journals by checking articles that have been publish in the journal and the journal speciification before submitting a paper to a journal.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
Can someone guide about reference verification as per journal formate.
Relevant answer
Answer
Reference should be furnished as per J. syntax for review article and article . No relation between the two .
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
6 answers
I'm looking to purchase premium plagiarism detection software. Which one is the most reliable and accurate on the market?
Relevant answer
Answer
Turnitin
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
I plan to post a research pre-print in arXiv.org of a paper that I already submitted for publication in a journal.
If the pre-print gets cited, I wonder if the citations can be attributed to its corresponding journal article once it gets published.
I hope those with experience on this can provide some insights below.
Relevant answer
No, I mean submission of an article. Thank you for the clarification. Arxiv may allow, butit may depend on the journal for publishing
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
16 answers
I need to publish my article but for free in physical therapy and rehabilitation field
Relevant answer
Answer
Bulletin of physical therapy journal.
If you are master candidate, it will be a fit for you
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
Particularly, I need good academic journals relating to the questions above that I can read in order for me to be able to discuss the issue extensively.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi
I think operational research is a great concept so far as problems are concerned.. It first breaks the problem into basic components ans then solve it step by step through various analytical parameters like analysis of variance... Regression analysis.. n so on...
Better step towards economics if implemented....
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
3 answers
Manipulations of metrics take many forms, with new ones likely to emerge, but they all share some key traits because of the nature of the object they target: impact.
Editors increase their journal’s impact factor by entering into co-citation agreements with other journal editors, which involves having the authors of one journal cite articles from the colluding journal; some universities invite their faculty to cite each other to help improve the institution’s rankings; and other universities pay productive scholars from other institutions. The presence of fake collaborators also facilitates the publication and visibility of article thanks to the institutional brands they are associated with.
Relevant answer
Answer
Abhishek - I suppose that this issue here is around the context of 'fraud'. Some will see view fraud as 'illegal' activity - but journal publishers and their editors etc who 'scratch each other's backs' - don't usually view it as fraud. They often see it is an acceptable part of 'business' - but may want to keep it as a 'known secret' - which is where the lable of fraud seems to stick a bit more. It's often about different worldviews. Manipulation of primary research data is usually viewed very negatively as direct 'research fraud' - but the same 'rules' don't seem to apply for journal citation manipulation and coercion.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
7 answers
  • First of all, in the Nature Index (±82), all the journals are not Nature journals .
  • Secondly, how we differentiate Natural Index journals from Web of Science and Scopus index journals?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
16 answers
Does it really matter?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Asemoloye, your interesting question was asked ca. 1 1/2 years ago. It would be interesting for the readers of this thread to know what happened in the meantime? Did you submit your paper elsewhere, and was it accepted by a different journal? Did you make better experiences with other manuscripts in the meantime? In any case, it is absolutely clear that rejection after more than a year in review is absolutely unprofessional. In our field of research (chemistry) the normal duration of the peer-review process is ca. 2-3 months. Reviewers are normally given ca. 3 weeks to write their reviews. Personally, I try to write my reviews within a few days. Thus there is absolutely no reason to keep a manuscript unde review for more than a year.
With best wishes, Frank Edelmann
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
24 answers
You'll find in the link below the kernel version of Beall's list - a list of potential predatory journals created by a librarian Jeffrey Beall. Also, a list of new predatory publishers is available in the link below:
Relevant answer
Answer
Akhlash P Singh all SCOPUS and ISI indexed journals, regardless of their citescore or impact factor, publish research articles with non scopus and ISI indexed references, including those published by predatory journal and publisher (according to Jeffrey Beall list).
My question is, do you think Jeffrey Beall needs to establish a publishing company and indexing organization? A publishing company and indexing organization that does not accept the publication of research articles with non-Scopus and ISI indexed references, including research articles published by the predatory journal and publisher identified by him (Jeffrey Beall).
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
Clarivate Analytics announced that it was moving toward a future that calculated the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) based on the date of electronic publication and not the date of print publication.
Will this results in a significant drop in journal impact factors?
Relevant answer
Answer
As usual you will find for and against depending on the adopted strategy for promotion in universities, especially southern hemisphere versus northern hemisphere. Moreover, From the economic point of view what will happen to paid open source publishing versus mix approach followed by well known journals!
Read along more:
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
21 answers
Dear colleagues,
Today I received an email from "[email protected]" with the following text:
Dear Author, Congratulations, Your recent publication has been provisionally selected for Research Awards and recommended by our scientific committee. So kindly nominate with your recent research profile/resume through an online submission system. After a few steps of profile verification and registration processes you will get your Research Award. Selected Award Category: Best Research Award Note: Submit your updated profile under the selected award category.   With regards, The Award Manager, NESIN Research  Awards An International Research Awards ScienceFather
Reference:
There was also a nomination link, which I removed from the text above and that I did not try to open, as well as the abstract of a paper that was accepted a few days ago and made available online about 10 hours before that mail was being sent. According to the website (https://sciencefather.com/awards/), one needs to pay a registration fee in order to apply for an award. Is this a new scam? Thanks for your help.
Relevant answer
Answer
It's a scam. They will later ask you to pay for your award.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
4 answers
The new update of Scimagojr has published. You can check the journals rank in the following link: https://www.scimagojr.com/
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks do much
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
7 answers
It is well known of the importance of statistics in research to support your answers. Please define
any statistical test, what does it do and where to apply them.
Please explain the difference between test and statistical test.
The tests such as chi square are they normal tests or are statistical? Please give examples of both and explain as much as possible.
(the blood and urine tests are completely different tests and should be considered separately. In the same way as biochemical assays. Is there anything to add to the tests explained, tests, "as chi square" and statistical tests?)
Any kind of contribution will be welcome. I will from time to time add some tests to explain/complete or set names. I think it is an important question.
In the publications how many different kinds of journals/publications are there and please give an explaination to them. I could start by saying predatory, sleeping beauties and what was the name for a "common journal"? If there is another name I can find I will add it in. I would like to make a document with all your answers and load it to the question.
Maybe I will exclude if they are redundant. I might add threads of more questions related to the subject.
Thank you very much
Relevant answer
Thank you. I would like to give it a citation. I would read it.
Try this resource:
Bruin, J. 2006. newtest: command to compute new test. UCLA:
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
7 answers
I want to identify the best journal. To do this, I found three websites namely 1.SCImago Journal & Country Rank portal, 2. Web of Science, 3. Academic Journal Guide (AJG), also known as the “ABS list”. But I am in dilemma which one is the most accepted? May I able to mix any two for journal selection?
Relevant answer
Answer
There is no such thing like "the best journal". All measures have a limited meaning, and all are calculated on limited data. None of the platforms use complete datasets of citations etc., and not all platforms are independent ones. Platforms maintained by publishers give preference to their own journals. Generally, I think that the hunt for high ranking and citation measures is doing harm to science. Journals have also other qualities besides their impact factors. See also this discussion: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Publishing_only_in_the_journals_with_high_impact_factors_or_publishing_good_papers_no_matter_IF_or_no_IF_journal_and_achieving_high_citation_score2 .
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
3 answers
It would be great if you can give me the details of such journals.
Relevant answer
Answer
MDPI Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Link:
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
11 answers
Dear sir/Madam
I'm pursuing a Ph.D. in the area of image processing. As per my academic regulations I have to publish two papers in SCI/SCOPUS indexed journals. Already I sort out some good journals but their publication time is so long. I want to complete my course as early as possible. So kindly suggest to me some rapid/fast publications in the area of image processing using deep learning. kindly help me in this regard. thank you for your consideration.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
Dear Colleagues,
I would like to ask for your opinion on The Academic Times website / portal.
Recently, they contacted me to publish a short note about the research I'm doing. I noticed that the site is quite active on major social networks and describes research conducted by many leading research centers.
I wonder what is the reputation of this website and credibility. Do you know their business model? Actually, very little information about the company itself is available on their website.
Thank you for your help!
Relevant answer
Answer
Are you asking opinion regarding the interface?
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
I am new to academic journal simulation, I want to use Cloudsim toolkit for my simulation but I don't find any comprehensive training for this, if you know any 0-100 training for learning simulation with Cloudsim toolkit please suggest it 🙏
Relevant answer
Answer
You can take many courses in edx platform. there are many courses about cloud computing.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
7 answers
We know the discussion about predatory journals. but.... what they publish? I found interesting articles in Journals which are (maybe) predatory journals and found articles that were formally excellent, scientifically fulfilling criteria but somehow I was missing the sense of the paper. If science should say something new, can we really millions of scientist, hundreds of thousands of researches and projects, thousands of journals ... find something new?
Is the market not made for "predatory articles" confirming everything already written - to be cited more and have more relevant sources?
Relevant answer
Answer
One of the common characteristics of 'predatory' definitions is - taking publication fees without conducting proper peer-review process. This implies they tend to deceive authors pretending that the peer-review was taken place for submitted articles. So, technically this fee should be an APC. However, some times, there could be submission fee as well. Thus, you need to pay this fee before the (fake) peer-review is started.
If I go back to your original question about 'predatory articles or scientists', yes, there are many. However, I am not sure whether it is appropriate to use the term 'predatory' for them since we already have some consensus about the attributes of 'predatory journals' (i.e. taking money for mere publishing). The pray works other way around. The pray gives money for mere publishing. There are two types of prays: those who don't know where they publish and those who deliberately submit to fake journals. Indeed, the second category is the 'predatory aricles/scientists' you meant, I guess. Yes, they produce these research with a view to increase their publication counts or/and citation counts easily. We hardly see any scientific value of them.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
7 answers
My view can be subjective and partial, but somehow I see similarities among the recent research in social science and FF processes. Projects are financed for three maybe four years, results you should achieve in one or two years. We split the research into partial articles because they give us more "credibility" and better reward in the job..... etc.
I hope you share different opinions and you see the sense of science in helping the world understand what is happening and not to publish more, get more citation, have a higher value and better reward from the employer.
Sometimes I feel burnout and miss the sense of publishing with thinking about potential citation and acceptance and say something that many scientists can use.
Relevant answer
Answer
We may not like the so-called fast industries, but they make our day to day easier and more comfortable. We no longer break our heads when we need a quick bite or new clothes for a teenager. We get what we need, and we get it fast. Fast industries guarantee us accessibility, quality and service standards. The digital revolution and affordable internet access arrived in the 1990s and made almost any B2C industry (always fragmented) fast. Grocery shopping became fast due to internet orders and delivery services, Amazon became the largest provider of daily purchases. Our way of buying almost everything from transportation services to flowers has changed. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2020/10/20/with-success-in-fast-food-and-fast-fashion-is-it-time-for-fast-education/amp/
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
12 answers
Dear Colleagues,
One question scratches a corner of my mind, so I decided to ask it here. Do you think that sometimes peer review (single or double-blind) is too harsh and too cruel against the manuscript? Even though I have managed to publish some papers so far, I still get the impression that the reviewers seek a perfect paper. Even if the reviews stick to the ethical boundaries, being too hard can discourage beginners like me. Also, I think sometimes they do it deliberately to show the superiority of their knowledge and experience. Similarly, some comments can be the comments that have been provided just for the sake of providing something. What do you think about it? Thank you beforehand.
Best
Ibrahim
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ibrahim Niftiyev many thanks indeed for your interesting technical question. This is certainly a question of broad general interest. Personally I have published 400+ research papers, all of them in international, peer-reviewed journals. Of course the reviewers look for "perfect" papers.
In my personal experience I would suggest the following criteria for a good / well-published research paper:
1. The topic of the paper should perfectly match the scope of the journal.
2. The paper should be written in error-free English.
3. The manuscript should have an eye-catching title.
4. Most importantly, the work described in the manuscript should have at least some degree of novelty. Lack of novelty (= routine work) is the most common reason for "desk rejections".
5. The manuscript should describe a "full story", i.e. the work must not be unduly fragmented.
That's about it. Of course you can find numerous guides about "Characteristics of a Good research Paper" or "What are the characteristics of a well-published paper" but this is just my personal advice.
Please keep in mind that in most cases when reviews are harsh / cruel chances are that a manuscript is flawed or even rubbish. Many manuscripts are written in poor English, report boring routine results or have serious technical errors.
Good luck with publishing your own work. Please stay safe and healthy! 👍
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
Does anyone know what referencing style the International Journal of Business Communications Referencing uses? The site just takes you around in an endless loop of no information. I've emailed the three emails on the contact us section and they have just told me to look on the website (after I have explained its an endless loop) or contact people on that contact section (the contact us section links off to a page that doesn't actually exist.) I could compare and contrast the different referencing styles Sage publishing uses but before I spend a lot of time on this can anyone in the world answer this question as Sage can't seem to answer it themselves.
Side note: I have no idea why these journals think they should not provide decent customer service.
Relevant answer
Answer
APA.
The info is here (https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/JOB) but it's not explicit so I'm not surprised you missed it. It states:
"Manuscript Preparation
Write the manuscript in English, following the format specified in the Publication Manual Of The American Psychological Association (6th edition). You may use either U.S. or British spelling, but use U.S. punctuation."
The American Psychological Association is the APA and the guidelines on referencing are here:
Good luck!
A
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
9 answers
Dear Researchers/Professors,
Could you please explain the Merits and Demerits of journal publications under the special issue?
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Agree with Rifat Bhat
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
166 answers
Dear RG community. I have a question that probably most of you are not facing. But where are the citations in RG to papers written in the former URSS? First-class Soviet Journals such that Journal of experimental and theoretical Physics (JETP and its letters) and Low-temperature Physics (from Kharkiv)
Vzla 09/05/20
Thanks to various inputs to this thread, the topic of discussion became wider & more interesting: The kind of science made in the former URSS: Did it become after the cold war a forgotten ghost? or Did it spread all over the world? or Did former URSS scientists change their science schools for new ones?
Regards,
Pedro L.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear colleagues, I have already said on several occasions that the indicators usually used to assess the impact of an investigation are not fair and respond to the interests of great Editorials, those that have open-access journals and, with that, the obligation to pay for to post. Many journals from the former USSR are not published by Western publishers, so they are ignored by databases such as Scopus and WOS.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
23 answers
The Dolos list has started to work well, but I do not think this opposition to predatory publishing is enough. From what I have seen, there is no collective or institute (consisting of researchers) of reference that denounces this sector. It could be a collective whose objective would be to establish regular reports and publish statements about this sector. The collective aspect would give more weight to this opposition. For the moment, I have the impression that these are mostly isolated actions from researchers. What do you think about this idea ?
I just have to warn you of one thing: A researcher who publicly opposes this sector would have to assume unpleasant consequences. For my part, a few days after launching the Dolos list, I was already receiving threatening messages.
Best regards,
Alexandre.
Relevant answer
Answer
Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers
Between 2009 and 2012, Jeffrey Beall published four articles which analysed 18 publishers (17 of which he identified as predatory). He also introduced the term predatory in the context of scientific publishing. In 2012, he started Beall's List, which maintained a list of predatory publishers and journals. This became a valuable resource for those who wanted to know if a journal was legitimate, although others were very critical of the list. This article considers what he wrote and the list he developed and the criticisms that have been levelled against Beall's list. Beall's legacy can be considered to ensure that the problems of fraudulent or inappropriate publishing practices are highlighted and that the scientific community remains aware of the problem. Unfortunately, his legacy has not led to an eradication of predatory journals, and the problem appears to have become worse in the past decade. Although there is opportunity to build on his legacy, there have been few practical moves, and this article suggests that there is an opportunity for clearer, more universally accepted guidelines and approval criteria for quality journals...
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
13 answers
Many authors are unsure the process of how academic journals work and how the process of manuscript submission to a journal proceeds, or how an editor thinks. Here a quick bit of information.
Rule 1 – best not to contact the journal editor for an update on your paper status. Only if it has been a really long time (maybe like 2 months). The editor is really busy, and you don’t want to get them upset. The world is not your oyster.
Rule 2 – you might think acceptance of your paper is all up to the reviewers – not true. The editors make the final decision. They click the button to accept or reject. So best to be respectful.
Rule 3 – when submitting a manuscript, don’t take any shortcuts or leave anything out. It looks sloppy. Like, don’t leave out any of the coauthors on the title page when the submission process asks. Don’t leave out your academic address when the submission process asks. Answer all questions completely during the submission process. Remember to write a letter to the editor for the journal you are submitting to.
Rule 4 – whatever you do, don’t leave markers of a prior submission to another journal in your submitted manuscript, like, Dear XYZ (editor of prior journal from a prior submission) or the name of the other journal ('We’re submitting to journal ABC.' Wrong!), or your IEEE status for a non-IEEE journal.
Rule 5 – address all reviewer queries one by one. Make some changes as requested, and state where they are in the manuscript. Mark in the text (highlight copy). Don’t leave anything unanswered. Make substantiative changes. If you can’t do something the reviewer requests, state why. Be polite. Never be argumentative.
Rule 6 – On revision, only include latest highlight and plain copy in submission. Do not include old versions of the manuscript or old letter or old anything else. It can confuse the reviewers and the editor and waste their time. Reject! If by some chance your paper is accepted like that, the dopy typesetter may publish an old version from your many versions included in the last submission!
Rule 7 – if your manuscript is rejected, don’t complain. Either don’t go back to that journal, or try try again with some other work when you complete it. Even if you had a paper accepted there before, doesn’t mean your new paper will be accepted or even reviewed. Reviews take the time of the expert reviewers. The wise editor will only have a paper reviewed, or re-reviewed, if it seems to have a good chance of meeting the journal's standards - and as a result, reviewers will be happy to review for the journal.
Rule 8 – don’t be discouraged if your manuscript is rejected. Editors make mistakes. Your work may be excellent, it just takes another journal editor to recognize it. Or, it may take many reviews and many rejections at many journals and many rewrites before the manuscript becomes excellent. Happened to me.
Rule 9 – get your revision done promptly if possible. Don’t pester the editor for more time if at all possible. Editors have limited time, and changing a due date is a real time waster for them. They will remember when it comes to checking the accept or reject box! Have consideration and get your work done on deadline.
Rule 10 – check if the journal has a fee (APC) beforehand. Look for it yourself on the website. Don’t waste the editor’s time by asking them. If you have to ask how much the fee is, you can’t afford it! Go to a free journal.
Rule 11 – similarly, don’t ask if a journal is fully indexed. You should be able to determine that yourself. Even if it is not fully indexed yet, it may already be a mainstream journal that many authors send their work to. Support the journal as it goes for full indexing.
Rule 12 - “presubmission inquiry” – this new phenomenon and terminology is never a good idea. Sorry to inform you, this is not LaLa Land. The editor does not have time to provide a personal in-depth analysis, performance estimate, or summary review for the inquirer. You are not special! If that paper gets submitted to the journal - Reject! Only in the case of an editor’s colleagues and coworkers, who sometimes feel that they should send a preinquiry, with justification, to stave off conflicts of interest.
Rule 13 – don’t use impact factor as the only guide as to where to submit your article. Other factors are important, like, is the journal becoming more prestigious. Here a place where you can find that out. Add a journal name and scroll down to the graphs. Are the trends up or down? https://www.scimagojr.com/
Rule 14 – don’t try to cozy up to the editor and become their friend. They know what you are doing and they don’t like it. Reject!
Rule 15 – suggest reviewers if you like, but don’t think they will automatically be used. First of all, only use the reviewer’s academic email address, not gmail or anything else. But, editor may not even feel like using suggestions, or may not need them. And if they try, most often the suggested reviewer says no – either too busy or they don’t realize authors of paper they are being asked to review.
Rule 16 – if you don’t have the money for the APC fee, don’t agree to it and hope you will have the money to pay for it later. Doesn’t happen. Collection agents will call your workplace, even from overseas! Bank on it! Happened to me.
Rule 17 – paper must have good English. Use an English language service or if your university has an English language office if needed. Papers with poor grammar rarely get reviewed, let alone accepted. Otherwise, send your paper to a journal in your own language. Gotta do it. You think it's not fair that the English should be perfect? Too bad! Next!
Rule 18 – paper must be well written. Add senior authors who know how to write a paper if helpful. Do everything they tell you. It may take many revisions and months but you get a solid paper.
Rule 19 – hyperlinks are being used more often now in the text of the manuscript and even in the references. Every link better work. An editor finds broken links? Fail!
Rule 20 – check your paper for spelling. Every word must be perfect before submitting your manuscript. A spell check takes a few minutes. Do it!
Rule 21 – get your citations in order. Too lazy to fix it? The editor will think so. If you are doing references manually and you get something out of order and have to reorder everything, or in a revision need to add, tough. That’s life. Get it right.
Rule 22 – don’t complain that somebody published something out from under you. Get your work done. If you give a presentation at a meeting, let your work sit around for 2 years and then somebody else has published it – too bad! Life is unfair. A personal pity party won’t help.
Rule 23 - don't think the editor is discriminating against you on the basis of your country if you get a reject. Any editor worth their salt is considering the impact of the paper, not where it is from. If an editor starts rejecting papers on the basis of country, they are going to miss good papers, their journal goes downhill, and no more editor. So don't think 'poor little me' and believe that your country or your name is the reason for the rejection. More like, you need to improve your papers!
Rule 24 - don't expect special treatment on your submission if you review for the journal. There is a Latin phrase for that, it is quid pro quo. It would compromise the review process.
Rule 25 - if your manuscript does pass initial screening and is reviewed, in a perfect world, there would be maybe 2 or 3 reviewers, they would all hand their reviews in on time and they would all heartily agree on the fate of the submission. Wrong! Almost never happens. Reviewers are often late, sometimes they never even hand anything in (maybe they ask for another week and still turn nothing in), and some may say accept while others say reject. They can also get huffy if the editor doesn't do what they say. To make sure there are sufficient reviewers, and if there is a lot if interest, you might get 4 or 5 reviews. If there is less expertise or people are busy you sometimes only get 1 review - even a great paper. That's just the way it is. Some things will never change.
Rule 26 - Citations need to be in perfect form. Do not have some et al. and some full set of authors, unless that is the journal style. Do not show some cites in the text as numbers and others as author names. Sloppy! References should be in the journal style. Too lazy to do it? Fine! You can publish in low-level journals for the rest of your life!
Rule 27 – many authors have some notion of how their paper is screened being like the old days – the editor and editorial board are sitting around a huge conference table all day, studying stacks of submitted manuscripts in paper form, smoking pipes (at least the guys) and drinking tea and coffee, spending an hour or more discussing the merits of each submission, and then voting on it with a roll call. Wrong! The screening process consists of the editor taking a quick look at the paper, maybe on a tiny laptop, reading the Abstract and some of the content, checking for plagiarism, perhaps studying prior submissions by the authors and their outcomes. A seasoned editor can do that in 3 minutes and thereupon make a decision to send for review or to desk-reject. If the system is set up correctly, the editor receives an email assignment of the manuscript immediately after it is submitted, and if they’re not too busy, they may look at it then and there. So don’t be too surprised if your submission comes back with desk-reject less than 5 minutes after you submit it. It means the editor is on top of things!
Rule 28 – you might think that every manuscript submitted to a journal gets a review. Nope! At the best journals, it may be like 1 in 10. They get 5000 submissions per year. It would be virtually impossible and not fair to reviewers to ask them to review 10x their current workload just for one journal. So the wise editor limits reviews to those manuscripts with a fighting chance of being accepted. Everything else gets a desk-reject.
Rule 29 – if you don’t hear anything in 24 – 48 hours after submission, even for slow journals, it probably means that your work has passed the initial screening and is going to review. That’s good! The editor thinks the manuscript might have merit for their journal. But it’s only a first hurdle passed.
Rule 30 – if your submission comes back after review with request for revision, huge! It means the editor wants to publish it! Don’t blow it! Make sure that you do everything the reviewers ask as much as possible! Take the time to do it. Make the manuscript perfect! And often, it will then be accepted.
Rule 31 – if your submission comes back with suggestion for de novo submission, that’s still pretty good. It means the editor finds merit with the submission, but not all reviewers are on board, and / or there is a major amount of work yet to do. If you are willing to take the time to fix everything that they mention, you can resubmit a de novo version and probably get your work accepted.
Relevant answer
Answer
Focus on a story that progresses logically, rather than chronologically. Take some time before even writing your paper to think about the logic of the presentation. When writing, focus on a story that progresses logically, rather than the chronological order of the experiments that you did. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/education/2015/jan/03/how-to-get-published-in-an-academic-journal-top-tips-from-editors
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
8 answers
Interested in publishing scientific research in the Arabic language for special requirements in Arab journals classified within the Scopes database and in the field of business administration with a reasonable cost and time
Depending on your experience, is there any journal that can be recommended by you?
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience
Relevant answer
Answer
That is Great news. I think the list has not been updated at least from 1 year, so it is nice to know that. Best wishes
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
7 answers
journals of scopus
Relevant answer
Answer
You should consult the list of SCOPUS indexed journals in economics and then your area of economics.
Badar Iqbal
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
99 answers
The Beall's web site scholarly-oa.com does not host the Beall's list of predatory journals and publishers anymore.
I have recenly found a web site https://predatoryjournals.com/ which claims to build on it and expand this list (see https://predatoryjournals.com/about/ ).
What do you think of it?
Update [August 1, 2019]: The question was originally posted on December 26, 2017 but now it looks like the site in question remains dormant and was not updated since 2017, which makes the question somewhat moot.
Relevant answer
Answer
"Predatory publishing (also write-only publishing[1][2] or deceptive publishing[3]) is an exploitative academic publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without checking articles for quality and legitimacy, and without providing editorial and publishing services that legitimate academic journals provide, whether open access or not."
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
9 answers
kindly provide list of physiology/ yoga journals with no publication charges indexed in pubmed/scopus/WOS/DOAJ.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
1 answer
I wonder if it is possible for the same conference, which takes place in different countries for the years with different committees, to have slightly different approaches to evaluation? Does the assessment depend on the reviewer? Could it be that in one country it is easier to pass reviewers than in the other? Please share your experience and knowledge.
Relevant answer
Answer
I have participated in several more or less respected conferences indexed in Scopus and / or in Web of Science. Based on my modest experience, I can roughly assess the current state of evaluation of submissions.
In my opinion, scholars from leading countries often apply the same (to manuscripts) or similar criteria in evaluating submissions to a prestigious conference. Perhaps in Eastern countries, such a process is viewed somewhat more liberally.
It seems to me that science should not be too formalized, because grain can germinate even in "dirty" paper.
But the scale used is about the same.
-3 - strong reject
-2 - reject
-1 - weak reject
0 - borderline work
+1 - weak accept
+2 - accept
+3 - strong accept.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
Hi, I am a medical graduate working on a systematic review. My institution has subscribed to Science Direct and OVID. My team currently has searched pubmed, Science Direct and Cochrane.
I want to enquire if Embase, Scopus and Web of Science are mandatory for a systematic review?
Relevant answer
Answer
well, it depends on the area you are working on. For instance, if your work concerns a solid clinical method, then PubMed is a must and others are not mandatory. You know, it has become a luxury to search all databases, but for most cases, PubMed-Scopus duo is satisfying. additionally, if your PICOs grabs RCTs as well and/or you need to cross-ref the review articles (secondary data) before the exclusion, you are to search the Cochrane too. To be more clear, if your aim is on sth quite related to the field of engineering or methodology, you need to search in Embase and WoS too. If you plan to have gray literature covered, google scholar is a great source. Last but not least, Embase and Scopus are tremendously overlapping, try an automated duplicates removal in advance.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
1 answer
It has been seen that most of the academic journals are either indexed in Scopus or in ABDC. It is difficult to find a journal that is indexed in both.
Relevant answer
Answer
In India Scoups is being given preference.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
34 answers
What is the best way to improve the quality of peer reviews for journal articles? In my experience, both as a reviewer and as an author, I have seen great variation in terms of the quality of peer reviews. This leads to inconsistency in terms of the quality of papers published in academic journals. It also leads to fairness problems. While a reasonably good quality article is rejected, sometimes you see a very low quality article appear in the same journal that rejected the former. Some reviewers write very short, hastily put together, thoughtless, and even wrong reviews, and yet, they are still used in the process. Others write extremely wrong reviews, full of inconsistent and fallacious arguments, and they affect the review process. What can be done to prevent this? Shouldn't there be a screening process to determine the eligibility of reviewers for the field that they will review the papers for? Can the reviews be reviewed by other reviewers? I have seen many unfair reviews (in both directions), and the problem is not isolated to certain journals or disciplines.
Relevant answer
Answer
Quality assurance reviews differ from peer reviews in that the focus of the quality assurance review is on the following criteria: Consistency: Were reasonable and consistent units of measurement and generally acceptable formulas used throughout? Are the appropriate number of significant figures reported? Correctness: Were matrix-compatible methods used? Were measurements within the working range of the method? Can measurements be traced to a recognized standard or source (e.g., the National Institute of Standards and Technology)? Can calculations be verified, starting from representative raw data and proceeding to the summary data presented in the paper or report? Coherence: Do the stated conclusions follow from the data presented? Are the assumptions clearly stated? Are inconsistencies between data and conclusions discussed? Clarity: Are special terms and acronyms defined? Can a person with a general technical background in the subject understand the paper or report? Conformance: Did the study follow the test/quality assurance plan, with appropriate calibrations and other quality-control checks, audits, and data validations? If not, is there a discussion of problems? Concordance: Were data quality objectives met? Were the data quality indicator goals achieved for precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and completeness?
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
33 answers
Sometimes peer reviewers write incorrect comments about your paper, or they disagree with you on some issue, but you know that they are wrong. If you are lucky enough to be given a chance to revise your paper, when you explain that they are wrong, they get defensive and write even worse reviews and change their recommendation to reject. What is the best way to handle this issue? Withdrawing the paper and submitting it to somewhere else? If we have to change our papers according to referee comments, just to have a chance to publish it, then it will be bad for academic discourse. I have seen this too many times that I recognize it as a problem in academic publishing. Unfortunately, people who are not very knowledgeable about an issue volunteer to review papers on that issue and yet, their review reports are given more weight than your rebuttals, when it comes to the decision on your paper. I have never seen a case in which the editor sided with the authors, when there is disagreement between the authors and reviewers. Peer reviewers always have to be satisfied, that is the unestablished rule. This kills plurality of ideas, causes to propagate wrong information, inflates irrelevant citations, inflates the size of papers, reduces the quality of published articles, etc.
Relevant answer
Answer
Regarding responding to the harsh or negative peer reviewer comments, you should deal with them as you would deal with any other comment. Give a point-by-point response to the comments, mentioning whether you agree or disagree with them. If you disagree with some of the comments, provide your reasons for doing so.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
6 answers
When we decide to select a journal for publication of a research article. Sometimes we get confused among impact factor and quartile ranking. Some journals have high impact factor but low quartile ranking and vice-versa. So, Readers are requested to express their valuable suggestions for the same.
Relevant answer
Answer
Choosing the right journal for publication can be a challenge. If I understand correctly, you wish to publish content from your thesis in the form of a journal article I am unsure as to how you can co-author thesis with other people, though. Did you mean that you have co-authored two other manuscripts that you wish to submit to journals?
The following points can be kept in mind for selecting a journal:
First ensure your indexation preference – SCI/SCIE/SSCI/ESCI/PubMed/Scopus etc. You can refer http://mjl.clarivate.com/ for finding the indexation of SCI/SCIE/SSCI/ESCI and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/journals for finding PubMed indexation.
Make a list of available journals in your subject area and survey the type of articles published in them. Compare the quality of your articles to those published in these journals and then make a list of journals with a suitable impact factor range.
Make sure the aims/scope of the journals match that of your study.
Check for the types of articles published by the journals.
Check all the other aspects of the journal such as peer-review process, instructions to authors, open access options, audience/readership of the journal, information about the publisher, time for peer review, acceptance/rejection rates etc.
Then, make a final list of the journals that meet all your criteria, prepare your manuscript according to the author guidelines and submit the manuscript.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
8 answers
This discussion will focus on research that is related to FDI. It will primarily be a discussion and a sharing platform of Resources and Knowledge for the research on FDI. It is with collaborating that we can improve upon the quality of the research on FDI. I will be sharing my resources here so that the scholarship can benefit from it and a lot of time and effort that is put into searching for resources and knowledge about the research is saved here.
For The Sake of Research
  • Bilateral FDI flows of the World Economies.
The source of the data is UNCTAD.
  • Journal of Finance in SCOPUS.
Ranking and metrics of Journals of Finance in SCOPUS
  • Country Wise Bilateral FDI Datasets
| 2001-12 |
|INFLOWS & OUTFLOWS|
|INSTOCK & OUTSTOCK|
Source UNCTAD
Relevant answer
Answer
Just wanted to share a book for understanding FDI and a great research starting point.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
3 answers
Hi all researchers
Please note that the International Journal of Business & Social Science is a predatory journal.
Relevant answer
Answer
I visit this journal and observe the following:
Firstly, The journal do not state the processing & publishing fee openly so is one of habit of predictory journal
Secondly, The Journal do not state about publishing ethics
Thirdly, The Journal does not explained well about the qualifications of Reviewers & Editors
So through this observations I don't like to publish in this journal ( predictory Journal). Thank you
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
2 answers
How the journal evaluators examine the work and the reproducibility of results?
Relevant answer
Answer
To ensure understandability, reproducibility, and replicability, the research methodology must be clearly spelled out and expatiated upon. In other words, all procedures carried out in a study must be explained in detail in the methods section, leaving no room for whats or whys. The following could render more insights.
PLOS. (2021, February 26). How to write your methods. https://plos.org/resource/how-to-write-your-methods/
USC Libraries. (2021, March 18). Research guides: Organizing your social sciences research paper: 6. The methodology. Research Guides at University of Southern California. https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/methodology
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
19 answers
It is cited in JCR.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Gomasa Ramesh In addition to my earlier replies indicating that there are fake websites. I now noticed that Scopus (see for link above) finally include the only authentic website: https://gabrielperi.fr/boutique/la-pensee/
So all others are fake/not correct.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
Your constructive remarks, comments, suggestions are welcome.
Relevant answer
Answer
The best is to share with your group, if they agree why not. Sure you can
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
9 answers
I am currently working on a paper that will probably surpass the common limit of 8000 words (excluding the appendices). I tried to limit the words and deleted as much recurring details as possible but it won't make it. The methodology is just lengthy for a sound reason.
I wish it to be published but the length will only make the cut for a handful of journals for the topic. Now, the question is...
Is it wise to divide a paper into two when they technically share similar literature and set of data for the analysis?
For other details, the paper basically has three goals:
1. To find statistical evidences that the construct exist
(It is not covered by traditional validity indices. Can be considered as experimental.)
2. To see whether the construct affects a test's reliability
3. To see whether the construct affects a test's validity.
I am thinking of dividing it into two where the first paper covers the 1st goal and the second paper covers the 2nd and 3rd. But as far as I can see it, they will basically have similar literatures and theoretical framework. The discussion will also be more fluid if they are all merged in one paper.
But still, the length of the paper. So, do you think I should divide it, or just go for the journals that accepts longer manuscripts?
Will dividing the paper have advantage other than having more journals that may accept it? Will dividing it count as a form of duplicate publication?
Relevant answer
Answer
I think, it is. For, it depends on the purpose, the aim, the reasons, the attempts and the deduction.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
What does a sister journal mean? Does they share the same impact factor?
Relevant answer
Answer
In academic publishing, a sister journal, mirror journal or companion journal is a newer academic journal that is affiliated with an older, better-established journal in the same field.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
30 answers
When it comes to choosing a good journal, it has always been debated which one is more important? Impact factor (IF) or journal quartile (Q)?
I give an example, you have three following journals, which one would you choose?
1- IF: 1.3 & Q1
2- IF: 2.5 & Q2
3- IF: 3.9 & Q3
Please select one of the three journals above and give a reason for that.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for the response. However, after considering all of the criteria you mentioned, we have to choose a proper journal for our paper.
Let me put the question in this way, what makes a journal better than others!?
In the main question, I gave three examples; could you please choose one of them?
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
4 answers
Dear all
I need to know how to calculate a CiteScore (CS) of an academic journal?
Thanks for your comments
The best
Relevant answer
Answer
You're welcome Asaad Hamid Ismail, and thanks for recommendation!
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
6 answers
How can I get involved in writing an article with someone else?
Does anyone want me to participate in writing a review article?
How?
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with you Mr. Naimish Kumar Verma.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
6 answers
jcr based impact factor not the other one.
Relevant answer
Answer
bioinorganic chemistry and applications
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
32 answers
Recently, I found an article that has been published in IEEE Access (DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045008), which is directly copied from a research article of ours (DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04213-z). A lot of figures and tables, and the text in body of the paper are same as our published paper. Moreover, most of the data are the same or have been only slightly changed and the text in the finding and discussion section is also mostly identical. We can see the same text with the same references (see the attached file).
Regarding this essential problem we sent an email to the editor handling of the paper. Then, the first author of the paper sent us an email, in which he tried to persuade us to forgive him. In fact, he confessed to committed plagiarism and asked us for mercy. Following reporting the problem to the EIC we received an email from IEEE Access as an investigation outcome as follow. "In the present case, we performed an investigation and discussed the case with the EIC, IEEE Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and myself. We believe that the article overlap is small enough that it does not warrant any further investigation."
We spent so much time on our paper, and they have just looked at our paper, modified it, and written another one. This is not fair at all. What can we do now? I would appreciate any kind of help.
Relevant answer
Answer
I suggest you file a complaint with COPE -- the Committee on Publication Ethics.
In addition, IEEE has a Ethics and Member Conduct Committee, and you could file a complaint with them as well -- naming not only the author(s) but the editor and the members of the committee who attempted to bury your original complaint.
In short, take your complaint to every source you can find. The last thing IEEE wants is to be accused of running a "predatory journal," but that certainly seems to be what is happening your case.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
7 answers
Hello,
I am currently conducting a comprehensive literature review on brand loyalty, using a deductive approach. So far, I analyzed more than 340 articles, but I was told that I should narrow my analysis to the articles published in top journals, if I want to publish my paper.
Do you know what is the best practice for this type of systematic review? If yes, do you know some articles that are arguing this issue of inclusion criteria (the fact of including only peer-reviewed articles, top journals, or on the contrary to also include conference paper, grey literature...etc)?
Relevant answer
Excellent idea Kathleen Desveaud , hope this message is not late.
You can also try this method by finding the most cited papers in your area using the keywords you are working with from Web of Science or other searched databased with citation scores. After doing that you can for example only record the top 30 highest cited papers by recording their corresponding authors details. This may help you with their contact details. It is very important to ask them via their contact details respectfully on the assistance in recommending atleast 10 top journals in their area (note, should be related to your searched keywords).
Upon receiving such feedbacks, check and remove duplicated journals mentioned by the corresponding authors you contacted to get the number of top journals you can start searching for your peer-review articles, conference proceedings, others.
Please, make sure you document all this process as you would need to report that in your work to confirm how you arrived by the searched papers.
In a nutshell you can also use experts in your field or highly cited papers in your field obtained from let's say Web of Science or others to arrive at what you are looking for.
Please, this is another way to go by that. I hope it helps some. Best of luck.
Be of good cheer and open to more ideas.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
23 answers
What are some of the difficulties or disadvantages, if any, of publishing in high impact journals?
Thanks in advance for your participation!
Relevant answer
Answer
The only drawback is the time. These journals take a long time for research to be accepted for publication and some of them are very expensive for my person.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
3 answers
Hello fellow Template searcher,
I was looking for Analytica Chimica Acta Template but I could not find it anywhere. So I decided to make one my own and share it. Enjoy all the styles that I have created.
This template could work for most Elsevier journals.
Thanks,
Viraj G.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
14 answers
I have come up with a method and had written a paper on it. Paper got rejected by a journal stating that there is no theoretical novelty.
I am kind of confused on why the novelty that I am able to see, is not visible for the reviewer?
How do I highlight it?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can highlight it in abstract, introduction and conclusion. You can also highlight you major contributions by adding the bullet list as highlights of your work at the end of introduction section.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
42 answers
I have submitted to an article to a reputed journal. But I now find that the journal has time to first decision of 130 days. Is it possible to withdraw the manuscript. It is not yet assigned to an editor.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear All, personally I would seriously considers withdrawing a manuscript when the peer-review takes longers than ca. 6 months. If you do not get any response from the journal, this shows to me that the editor doesn't work professionally. This is particularly true when you already contacted the editor by e-mail and received no answer.
For more information about withdrawing a submitted article please see this very recent (published 7 days ago) link entitled
How do I withdraw a submitted (but not published) article from peer-review?
Withdrawal of your manuscript gives you the chance to re-submit it to another journal ( perhaps an even better one) and get it published in reasonable time.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
41 answers
I have recently received a invitation from the journal "Current Pharmaceutical Bio-technology" to submit a research article. As i didn't received any invitation before. so, is it normal to to receive such invitations or is it a big thing ???
Relevant answer
Answer
It is not a big deal. For example, the editor or guest editor is working on a special issue, and they do search on the subject and find out you have worked on it, so they send you an email asking for your contribution.
Best Regards,
Jean
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
13 answers
I am interested in independent director,board composition,political connection,CEO compensation,Board diversity topics and firm performance of Chinese listed firms,but I want to follow some good journals in the field of corporate governance and also some blogs ,or conferences from that I can select my topic .so could you please share your experiences with me,that which journals will be good for my topic selection and how can I know that which area is new one in the last 3 years.thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
6 answers
Hello everyone
I submitted a research article and a new manuscript for consideration for publication in a Journal (Q1 and IF=3.9) about 20 days ago.
It was mentioned in the last step of submission, "You will receive a message from Electronic Manuscript Upload System through the corresponding email: **********. If you do not receive a confirmation in a day or two, please contact us at **********". We did not receive any submission confirmation. My supervisor sent an email to *********** 17 days ago, and we have asked for information on the status of the submission of our paper. But we did not get any reply from ***********.
We have sent several emails to the editor-in-chief of the journal. But we did not get any reply.
Did they receive the article at all?
I want to withdraw my article, but when they will not reply to our emails; how can I do this work?
What do I do now?
Would you please help me.
thanks in advance
Relevant answer
Answer
It only indicates bad quality journal and board of editors. Such people usually copy the article and publish by their names. That is plagiarism. And it is growing these days. Need to be carefull
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
115 answers
The researchers are always conducting research as well as they are publishing their research findings in the reputed journals. We all are aware that to publish a scientific article in the renowned journal needs more efforts and surely needs more time. However, the researchers need to spend their valuable times when they are writing the manuscript especially when they are unable to publish their desired journal, then, they need to spend more time for the changing of the reference writing style. Therefore, do you agree that the similar reference writing style in different journals is useful for the researchers?
Relevant answer
Yes. I agree with that. If you use Mendeley, for instance, you will not face any problem during changing from one stile to another.
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
5 answers
We are preparing to submit a manuscript in field of Computational Chemistry (Computer aided-drug design). However. due to our current budget we won't be able to afford the cost of the processing fees charged by most open access journals.
Is there any available free-to-publish journal(s) that can publish our work - either open access or "society" journals?
Relevant answer
Answer
International Journal of Advanced Chemistry
  • asked a question related to Academic Journals
Question
26 answers
I wrote an art